A second full day of preparing videos and materials for the epic Nightfood promotion, something I've not done so extensively before. I recorded two videos late last night in the freezing and dark 'studio' room I use for filming. In the end, the sound, as well as the lighting, was too bad to use, so I spent the morning re-recording two similar videos. I was so inspired watching them back that I decided to upload them both!
Then, a slight distraction of fixing a new brake cable to my mother's bicycle. The original cable was an odd sort which exposed the raw wire in the middle, it oddly threaded through a two narrow rings in the metal frame. Modern brake cables are shielded throughout. The two options were to cut the cable sheath, or drill the metal bike frame, so I chose the latter, and re-threaded the cable quite easily.
After that, work on the Nightfood video conversion and preparation of the many materials I'll be posting and sharing about it.
One part of the talk made me think about automation, both AI and other forms, like music sequencing, and which are better or worse for us, for humanity, for art. I realised that automation that creates more for work us, is a new task-master, is a good thing; and that automation which does work for us, assists laziness, is bad. It's true that the laziness may allow us to do things beyond our skills, a power-saw may enable us to cut down a tree that we may not have been able to. In this argument it's not really 'lazy' to use that vs. a handsaw, but it would be lazy to use the power-saw, then rest for the rest of the day such that both saws would take as long. If you work just as hard with both saws you'd cut down far more trees with the power-saw, thus your skills would be genuinely improved; thus the improvement is still measured by the human work.
If a new tool is making you work as hard or harder, it's probably helping you do more and better. If you find you're being lazier, the changes are it's a harmful tool. At the very least, your (lazy!) competitors would be acting as you, giving you no advantage, but perhaps worse, the machine is somehow taking a credit from you. The labour and intelligence really needs to be yours, not the machines. The work-laziness ratio is the measure of ultimate utility.


